Israel Already Demanding New Term's in U.S. Gaza Proposal
Israel Rewrites Trump’s Gaza Plan Before Ink Dries
Written by Dominick Skinner | 1 October 2025
Donald Trump’s “peace plan” for Gaza was flawed from the moment it was announced, with the plan delivering on all points that would favour a continued occupation, while providing Israel with the plausible deniability to complete their genocide, should Palestinian factions fail to succumb to that occupation. That flawed plan favours Israel, and even still, Israel are demanding more.
Axios are reporting that Netanyahu is demanding tougher disarmament clauses, a security buffer zone carved into Gaza even after a supposed withdrawal, and the sidelining of the Palestinian Authority. In other words, the deal that was a gift to Israel has become a set of moving goalposts, adjusted before Hamas has even had the chance to respond. The Israeli leader indicated that the plan would not continue in its current format immediately following the meeting with Trump where the plan was agreed to, switching his tone when he moved from English to Hebrew.
It was not enough for the Genocidal state that the deal on the table favoured the continuation of their historical crimes, and we shouldn’t be surprised when it comes to the only Apartheid state in the Middle East. From the politicians, like Ben-Gvir, who have publicly opposed the deal, to the previous admission by Benjamin Netanyahu that he personally feels a connection to the Greater Israel project, to the fact that Israel is consistently the source of ceasefire breaches, there was no question that Israel would be the one to break the deal.
Hamas have not yet responded to the proposal, as it was only delivered to them after its public release, despite reports that they had already agreed to it before the meeting happened. The US’s chief child molester has already demanded that Hamas respond within 72 hours, again, despite them not getting the proposal until after the meeting at the White House.
The regional façade is already cracking. Arab states that supposedly signed on are reported to be “infuriated” by Netanyahu’s edits, proving that Trump’s narrative of consensus was simply untrue, it was just a cover for a U.S.–Israel arrangement presented as fragile peace.
And so the deal that was never serious becomes even more absurd, and genocide rewarded with negotiation power, sovereignty denied in exchange for an endless occupation, and the word “peace” drained of all meaning until it becomes just another weapon.